WE HAVE MOVED!

"And I beheld, and heard the voice of one eagle flying through the midst of heaven,
saying with a loud voice: Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth....
[Apocalypse (Revelation) 8:13]

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Francis and the “new” Civilization of “love”

Over the past month or so I took the liberty to dispel the pseudo-trads notion that somehow the Church was returning unto Tradition by reading all of what Pope Francis has spoken or written since the dawn of his pontificate. Needless to say outside of his very unorthodox behavior hidden under the guise of a false humility I emailed my findings to various traditionalist prelates who agreed with my assessment. Brethren, we are dealing with another glorified Pope John Paul II who is in need of much prayer for his conversion. The continued Masonic ecumenism is intensifying as the world gets worse! And therein lies the problem. As St Anthony stated the Church would follow suit with the world and thence at Vatican II the Church adopted modern man’s error’s primarily starting first in philosophy which has thence brought about an upheaval in the theology. As the mind goeth so doeth the heart. 

It is quite alarming to me how anyone can possibly think that we are headed back in the “right” direction. In fact, I would argue not only do we continue progressing Pope Francis is moving the progressivist Conciliar Church in a rapid fashion to the point of no return, that is, the soon arrival of the Apostate Church of darkness wherein the Dogma of Faith is all but lost. Case in point is yet more reiteration from the Vatican II, cult of man, from Pope Francis for this esteemed respect for Islam? Where is that in Tradition? Hidden away of course… but still seen under the ever so “clear eyes” of the unhinged minds of the modernists in a hermeneutics of continuity. This new hippie Woodstock world in which the insane dreamers such as Pope Francis and his conciliar predecessors have been building does not reflect the Catholic Church in the least bit and yet why do men follow when they can clearly see how the Church has condemned infallibly such matters? The question is more of a demand now than ever, that is, now is the time to be evermore vocal unto those lemmings that are dropping off the Vatican II cliff in rapid pace. 

The man who cannot think deserves the type of leadership the Church has had since Council, a brain-dead, distracted, would be flock more interested in the nightly entertainment  shows and sports programming then rather read what the Council of Trent states. I was actually accused once by a Novus Ordite for studying too much! After all they can pop on line real quick and get the latest brilliance from the pseudo trad/modernist apologists who could sell you a hamburger under the guise of being a pork chop. A lack of critical thinking skills on top of the already decaying morals is a recipe for blind lemmings to follow a Pope who esteems the diabolical religion of Islam. I shall leave you all with an article(VaticanInsider) attached with what our current heretical Pontiff teaches and what the Catholic Church truly teaches. Time now more than ever to offer up our own selves in union with His Sacred Heart  as victims! How many souls being led off the cliff by the blind themselves. We are spiraling out of control towards the soon pseudo new world peace treaty in the Middle East that will have an antipope make an invalid/illicit excathedra uniting all religions as equal

 
Pope Francis and the "hidden hand" (Masonic/Marxist) 









“According to Al-Azhar, in his message the Pope stressed the Vatican’s respect for Islam and said he hoped every effort would be made towards achieving “mutual understanding between the world’s Christians and Muslims in order to build peace and justice.” Al Tayyeb apparently replied that the message Al-Azhar wished to get out is one of “respect for people of every religion and the safeguarding of human dignity and the highest values described in the Quran and the Sunnah.” He also said that Muslims are willing “to collaborate to help justice and progress grow among the people of the Earth.”

The Catholic Church condemns Francis and his teachings:
Whence it sometimes happens through error that Christians mingle with the women of Jews and Mohammedans and, on the other hand, Jews and Mohammedans mingle with those of Christians. Therefore, in order that such ruinous commingling of this kind through error may not serve as a refuge for further excuse for excess, We decree that such people of both sexes, that is, Jews and Mohammedans, be distinguished in public by a difference in dress in every province of Christendom and at all times, since this was also enjoined on such people by Moses. IV Lateran Council

We decree that those who give credence to the teachings of the heretics, as well as those who receive, defend or patronize them, are excommunicated. [...] If anyone refuses to avoid such accomplices after they have been ostracized by the Church, let them also be excommunicated. IV Lateran Council

Pope Pius X: "Here it is well to note at once that, given this doctrine of experience united with that of symbolism, every religion, even that of paganism, must be held to be true. What is to prevent such experiences from being found in any religion? In fact, that they are so is maintained by not a few. On what grounds can Modernists deny the truth of an experience affirmed by a follower of Islam?

St. Peter Canisius puts it this way: "Who is to be called a Christian? He who confesses the doctrine of Christ and His Church. Hence, he is truly a Christian thoroughly condemns and detests, the Jewish, Mohammedan, and the heretical cults and sects."

Blessed Nicholas Talvilich (died 1391): "You Mohammedans are in a state of everlasting damnation.  Your Koran is not God's law nor is it revealed by Him.  Far from being a good thing, your law is utterly evil.  It is founded neither in the Old Testament nor in the New.  In it are lies, foolish things, buffooneries, contradictions, and much that leads not to virtue and goodness but to evil and to all manner of vice."

Saint Peter Mavimenus (died A.D. 743): "Whoever does not embrace the Catholic Christian religion will be damned, as was your false prophet Mohammed." (Roman Martyrology, February 21st) [Upon this profession of the faith, the infidel murdered him.]

Saint Prosper of Aquitaine, A.D. 463: “From every nation and every condition thousands of aged people, thousands of youths, thousands of children daily receive the grace of adoption. [...]  For all who at any time will be called and will enter into the kingdom of God, have been marked out in the adoption which preceded all times.  And just as none of the infidels is counted among the elect, so none of the god-fearing is excluded from the blessed.” (The Call of All Nations)

Pope Eugene IVCouncil of Basel, 1434: “… there is hope that very many from the abominable sect of Mahomet will be converted to the Catholic faith.”

Pope Callixtus III: “I vow to… exalt the true Faith, and to extirpate the diabolical sect of the reprobate and faithless Mahomet [Islam] in the East.”

Pope Pius II - "Turn the anger of the Almighty against the godless Turks and Barbarians who despise Christ the Lord.....In the royal city of the east, they have slain the successor of Constantine and his people, desecrated the temples of the Lord, defiled the noble church of Justinian with their Mohometan abominations. Each success, will only be a stepping stone until he has mastered all the Western Monarchs, overthrow the Christian Faith, and imposed the law of his false prophet on the whole world"

Pope Leo X - "... the Turks and other infidels ... They treat the way of true light and salvation with complete contempt and totally unyielding blindness ..." 

Pope Benedict XIV: For all this cannot take place without a pretense of the errors of Mohammed, even if the faith of Christ is adhered to in the heart, and this is at variance with Christian sincerityIt involves a lie in a most serious matter and includes a virtual denial of the Faithmost insulting to God and scandalous to their neighborsIt even gives the Turks themselves a suitable opportunity to rate all Christ's faithful as hypocrites and deceivers, and accordingly to persecute them justly and deservedly.

St. Thomas Aquinas on Islam:
“He (Mohammed) seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh urges us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected; he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity.

St. John of Damascus’s (Doctor of the Church) Critique of Islam:
There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelite’s which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist.

            The Sacred Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith, under Pope Saint Pius X, in 1907, in answer to a question as to whether Confucius could have been saved, wrote: "It is not allowed to affirm that Confucius was saved.  Christians, when interrogated, must answer that those who die as infidels are damned."
"In the worship of any religion whatever, men can find the way to eternal salvation, and can attain eternal salvation."  "We must have at least good hope concerning the eternal salvation of all those who in no wise are in the true Church of Christ."  (Syllabus of Errors)

Pope Gregory XVI, A.D. 1831-1846 (D.1613): "Now we examine another prolific cause of evils by which, we lament, the Church is at present afflicted, namely indifferentism, or that base opinion which has become prevalent everywhere through the deceit of wicked men, that eternal salvation of the soul can be acquired by any profession of faith whatsoever, if morals are conformed to the standard of the just and the honest.

Pope Pius VIII, A.D. 1829-1830: "Among these heresies belongs that foul contrivance of the sophists of this age who do not admit any difference among the different professions of faith and who think that the portal of eternal salvation opens for all from any religion.

Pope Leo XII, A.D. 1823-1829: "It is impossible for the most true God, who is Truth Itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and rewarder of good men, to approve all sects who profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their members.

Saint Robert Bellarmine S.J., Doctor, (died A.D. 1621): "I believe that for the good Christians there is eternal life full of every happiness and free from every sort of evil; as, on the contrary, for the infidels and bad Christians, there is eternal death full of every misery and deprived of every good." (Compendium)

Pope Saint Pius V (A.D. 1566-1572): "Infidels are outside the Church because they never belonged to, and never knew the Church, and were never made partakers of any of her Sacraments.

Pope St Pius X condemning Pope Francis’s  “new civilization of love”:
"But stranger still, alarming and saddening at the same time, are the audacity and frivolity of men who call themselves Catholics and dream of re-shaping society under such conditions, and of establishing on earth, over and beyond the pale of the Catholic Church, "the reign of love and justice" with workers coming from everywhere, of all religions and of no religion, with or without beliefs, so long as they forego what might divide them - their religious and philosophical convictions, and so long as they share what unites them - a "generous idealism and moral forces drawn from whence they can"…. I say, of all this, it is frightening to behold new apostles eagerly attempting to do better by a common interchange of vague idealism and civic virtues. What are they going to produce? What is to come of this collaboration? A mere verbal and chimerical construction in which we shall see, glowing in a jumble, and in seductive confusion, the words Liberty, Justice, Fraternity, Love, Equality, and human exultation, all resting upon an ill-understood human dignity. It will be a tumultuous agitation, sterile for the end proposed, but which will benefit the less Utopian exploiters of the people. Yes, we can truly say that the Sillon, its eyes fixed on a chimera, brings Socialism in its train.
We fear that worse is to come: the end result of this developing promiscuousness, the beneficiary of this cosmopolitan social action, can only be a Democracy which will be neither Catholic, nor Protestant, nor Jewish. It will be a religion (for Sillonism, so the leaders have said, is a religion) more universal than the Catholic Church, uniting all men become brothers and comrades at last in the "Kingdom of God". - "We do not work for the Church, we work for mankind." (humanism/Freemasonry)

Alas! this organization which formerly afforded such promising expectations, this limpid and impetuous stream, has been harnessed in its course by the modern enemies of the Church, and is now no more than a miserable affluent of the great movement of apostasy being organized in every country for the establishment of a One-World Church which shall have neither dogmas, nor hierarchy, neither discipline for the mind, nor curb for the passions, and which, under the pretext of freedom and human dignity, would bring back to the world (if such a Church could overcome) the reign of legalized cunning and force, and the oppression of the weak, and of all those who toil and suffer. These are teachings that it would be wrong to apply only to one's personal life in order to win eternal salvation; these are eminently social teachings, and they show in Our Lord Jesus Christ something quite different from an inconsistent and impotent humanitarianism.
Indeed, the true friends of the people are neither revolutionaries, nor innovators: they are traditionalists.”

Shall I continue on?………pray much a great storm cometh!
Crusade on! 



Pope Francis stated recently that "authentic" Islam is not a violent religion? Really?


1 comment:

  1. I am becoming quite concerned with the direction of the Vatican. The new appointments and the persecution of faithful is most alarming.

    ReplyDelete